Promotion to a knight, bishop or tower is called ”sub-promotion”. Although these pieces are less powerful than the queen, there are certain situations where it is beneficial to move too little. [16] The Internet has allowed many to create and share their own fake agricultural problems. While there are undoubtedly a lot of problems, perhaps the pinnacle of achievement was when Peter Wong created a completely new problem where whites win through promotion to the farmer! In the correspondence section of the 9/20 issue, the editors also stated: ”We believe that when a farmer reaches his eighth field, he has the right to become any character that the player considers the best; and of course, if it turns out to be detrimental to become a figure, he can still remain a farmer. (See Figure 19.) Among other things, this question, we thought, should have been discussed during the tournament.â In practice, Furigoma is launched. One of the players takes 5 pawns, shakes them and rolls them in dice on the board. If the number of promoted pawns pointing upwards is greater than the number of unplaced pawns, the other player opens the game. FIDE`s official way of indicating a peasant transport is the notation for the peasant train with the addition of the figure to which the farmer was transported at the end. If a farmer is promoted to a lady on the file, the official FIDE rating would be a8Q.
When a farmer on the F file grabs another digit on the E file and transports it to a jumper, fxe8N. A simpler reason is also given: ”The current law of the queen of pawns is full of innovations in ancient use. As M. wrote. Staunton on March 18, 1865, ”the old laws you cite have been constantly amended in recent years.” Fundamental law, for good! The law has never had any substance. No one will deny the use of Bauer on 8 in difficulty if Bauer on 8 is allowed in the game. The ”competent authority” for chess laws must be the players, not the problem composers, because the laws of the game regulate the problemist, not the problemist the laws of the game. Nearly a decade after the fake peasant was finally killed before the law, the famous fairy chess composer Thomas R.
Dawson took the time to do a drawing study with her. White must create three dummy pawns to reach the draw in a dead end! Let`s try another action! Take a look at this position. What would be the best step? When the White plays its pawn from b2 to b3, then the Black is in check: a coin can be promoted when it makes a movement that begins and/or ends in the ascent zone mentioned above (i.e. when it moves either in or out of the zone or completely within the zone). However, if the part in question is released (see drops), it can only be dropped in its unimproved state (regardless of where it is dropped and whether or not it has been captured as transported); it can then be announced in subsequent rounds as described above. [41] [42] White can even move another room, as shown here. In this position, Schwarz`s e-farmer is unable to make a non-capture movement, and his only legal move is to take the d-farmer from the white. But the black is not obliged to move this farmer. Yes: â(Skipping text) For me, however, I tend to have a different opinion. The checkmate in this case cannot be forced into five movements, unless the pawn loses its peasant character by reaching the ”royal line” and immediately and necessarily becomes a piece of one kind or another; or unless Black is forced by a law of the game to immediately replace the pawn with a character. (Text ignored) It is obvious that the right of transport is granted as a favor or privilege, assuming that a coin is more valuable than a farmer. So why limit this privilege by limiting the selection to a single piece? Why, in particular, does the player who is entitled to a reward for his abilities and success in leading his pawn to the ”royal line” demand a positive disadvantage by forcing him to exchange it for a piece of lesser value to him? Finally, and finally, the rule, interpreted strictly, is anti-republican – and it is a ”free country!” Why should the farmer have ”greatness” about himself If he is content with untitled merits, why not allow him to indulge in his taste for the private resort? Why raise him against his inclination to a rank to which he does not aspire?â – A.D.P.
A euphemism occurs when the player who promotes a pawn decides to turn it into a character other than a lady. Since the lady is the most powerful piece of chess, any promotion outside of the queen is considered ”less powerful” and therefore called sub-promotion. The origin of fake farmers is mysterious and unknown. However, this probably happened in the early 19th century. However, there are a few rare documents on this subject. The earliest known mention of the dummy pawn comes in 1832 from the book ”A New Treatise on Chess” by George Walker. When white plays 1.bxa8=Q?? (or any other promotion), Black wins with 1…gxh3 if White can`t stop Black from defeating him the next time with 2…h2#. Instead, white moves 1.bxa8 = P! when 1…gxh3 or 1…white Kxh3 fails, and other moves allow 2.Bxg2, with a draw final (Steinitz 1990: xxiv).
Steinitz wrote: ”We approve of the decision of the London Chess Congress of 1862, although the `fake` peasant regime has been denounced by some authorities.” (Steinitz 1990: xxiv) The same rule and explanation are given by George H.D. Gossip in The Chess-Player`s Manual (Gossip & Lipschütz 1902: 17 – 18, 33). This may be a frivolous question, because I believe that most chess players are good athletes, but I wondered: what is the technically correct procedure for promoting a pawn to a lady? Do you ask your opponent to put the lady in the ascension place, or do you take it yourself from his stack of captured coins (provided, of course, that the queens have been replaced)? If you have to ask your opponent what happens if he takes his time (as in case you have time problems, for example?). If you have to take it yourself, there are rules where you can keep the captured figures (the absurd situation is that your opponent hides the captured queen when the promotion becomes obvious). The logic is that if the peasant has power in 7th place as a farmer, why could he not extend his rights as a peasant to 8th place? Promotion to Shogi is not mandatory and the decision to promote a coin is at the player`s discretion. This is important because some figures lose some of their power during promotion (for example.B. a promoted silver general can no longer retreat diagonally); Therefore, there may be a legitimate reason to postpone the promotion, even if theoretically everyone earns more than they lose. [41] [42] The only exception to this rule is when a moving number advances so far that it would not have a legal train on subsequent trains if it were not promoted (for example. B, a farmer in last place) – in these cases, transport is mandatory. However, the promotion is permanent – once a piece has been announced, it cannot be downgraded to its original form until it is captured. In the 1938 (or 1933) match between Alexey Sokolsky and Grigory Ravinsky, promotion to a lady or tower allowed 66…Rc2+ 67.Ka1 (67.Kxc2 is a dead end) Rc1+ with one draw per eternal review.
The ascent to the knight also moves after 66…Rc8! 67.Ra6 Rxa8 68.Rxa8 Stalemate. However, the movement is 66. a8=B! played in the game wins for the white, with the following main variations: at different times, the peasant could only climb in the part of the file on which he was promoted or on which he started (a lady, if on the king`s file). In Italy, in the 18th and early 19th centuries, the peasant could only be promoted to a figure already captured. .